.jpg)
As AI's role in content creation expands, questions around Intellectual Property (IP) rights take centre stage. This is a real question that businesses are asking. A client raised this legislation with me this week.Two questions, in particular, stand out:1. Does a human-generated prompt qualify as creative input?2. Does keeping humans "in the loop" become a legal imperative for retaining IP?A recent paper offers invaluable insights into how the EU perceives copyright with respect to AI-assisted output, providing some answers and raising new questions for both AI practitioners and businesses.
📜 The Four Criteria for CopyrightAccording to EU law, AI-generated output can only be copyrighted if it meets four essential criteria:The output must pertain to a literary, artistic, or scientific domain.There must be human intellectual effort involved in the creation.The output must display originality and creativity through human-made choices.It has to be expressed in a tangible form.Given these criteria, a human-generated prompt could very well be considered a creative input, fulfilling the second and third criteria.
🤖 The Role of AI in CreativityDoes AI's involvement compromise originality? EU law suggests that as long as humans are making creative choices—like conceptualizing, executing, or editing—the output can be copyrighted. This may indicate that keeping humans in the creative loop is not just a good idea, but also potentially a legal imperative.
👤 Who Owns the Rights?It might seem logical to assume that the AI system's developer should have some claim to the output's copyright, but EU law generally vests authorship in the human user. Unless there is a direct collaboration on a specific work, AI companies usually can't claim ownership over user-generated output. This often gets reflected in terms of service agreements.
📈 Impact on AI AdoptionCompanies can technically lay claim to IP rights contractually, but this approach may deter adoption. Most prefer to allocate IP rights to the human user to encourage usage of their services.
🤔 Closing ThoughtsThe EU's stance champions human creativity and involvement. Even when advanced AI tools are used, the human element remains paramount in defining rights over content. As AI technologies evolve, this creates a fascinating intersection between creative freedom and legal requirements—one we'll navigate with increasing attention in the coming years.
.jpg)
